Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150T outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150T is 555 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Performs up to 6% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-6300 - 105 vs 99 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $74.04 vs $219.95
- Up to 64% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-4150T - $0.75 vs $2.09 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 6 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |