Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1893 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 20% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-4150T - 224 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $82.99 vs $219.95
- Up to 69% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-4150T - $0.37 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 12 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5010 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
224
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $82.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5011 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |