Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2641 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-390M - 171 vs 166 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13768 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |