Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 728 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 2% better in Valorant than Core i3-380M - 687 vs 674 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 8 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
687
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3071 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |