Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2864 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $25.7 vs $399.0
- Up to 92% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.12 vs $1.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 21% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-3240T - 269 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 24 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
223
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1021 minutes ago
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1022 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |