Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2237 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $59.4 vs $383.0
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 7% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i3-3220T - 221 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 16 vs 4 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Buy for $383 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
27.45803357314149%
Multi-Core
941
11.821608040201005%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |