Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $59.4 vs $419.95
- Up to 84% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i9-13900F - $0.2 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 14% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i3-3220T - 338 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 32 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
296
87.57396449704143%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
338
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
16.12903225806452%
Price, $
$419.95
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $419.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
16.776556776556774%
Multi-Core
941
5.464893431674313%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |