Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $59.4 vs $415.77
- Up to 84% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-10900 - $0.4 vs $2.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-3220T - 161 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 20 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
149
92.54658385093167%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
15.503875968992247%
Price, $
$415.77
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $415.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
26.877934272300468%
Multi-Core
941
11.174444840280252%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |