Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4061 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $59.4 vs $436.0
- Up to 86% better value when playing Control than Core i9-14900KF - $0.3 vs $2.09 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Control than Core i3-3220T - 209 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 32 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
199
95.21531100478468%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
14.354066985645932%
Price, $
$436
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $436 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
14.736164736164737%
Multi-Core
941
4.472008364223933%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |