Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1031 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $80.0 vs $129.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6700 - $0.7 vs $1.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-3220T - 129 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5045 minutes ago
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5046 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |