Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1858 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $80.0 vs $130.73
- Up to 31% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-8400 - $0.48 vs $0.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3220T - 186 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 6 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5406 minutes ago
Buy for $130.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5407 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |