Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - $59.4 vs $122.59
- Up to 47% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-10400 - $0.39 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 9% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3220T - 168 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 12 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
154
91.66666666666666%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
53.42465753424658%
Price, $
$122.59
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $122.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
32.02797202797203%
Multi-Core
941
17.14337766441975%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |