Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 1583 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $39.0 vs $79.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-3220 - $0.25 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |