Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1187 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700T - 17 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 6% better in Fortnite than Core i3-3217U - 223 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 8 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
223
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10392 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |