Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 144 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 4% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i3-3217U - 106 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 8 vs 4 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
106
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9482 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |