Key Differences
In short — Core i5-760 outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-760 is 684 days older than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Performs up to 3% better in Resident Evil 4 than Core i3-3217U - 156 vs 152 FPS
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
156
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |