Buy on Amazon
$429.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 822 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 24% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-3110M - 170 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 12 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel CM8064801548435 CORE I7-5820K Processor (15M Cache, UP to 3.60 GHZ)
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-3110M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell E |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
