Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Core i3-2350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1024 days newer than Core i3-2350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-2350M - 123 vs 113 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-2350M
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2350M | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
