Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2782 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $49.0 vs $708.59
- Up to 93% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.26 vs $3.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-2100 - 202 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.51/FPS
7%
Price, $
$708.59
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for $708.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |