Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100 is 2262 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 42% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 235 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $146.99 vs $399.99
- Up to 74% better value when playing War Thunder than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.63 vs $2.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 60 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 44 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
235
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$146.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $146.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11103 minutes ago
Buy for $399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11095 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 22 |
8 | Threads | 44 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 145 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |