Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 2921 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-3240 - 242 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 28 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7917 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
28 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |