Buy on Amazon
$120
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3985 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-950 - 244 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $100.0 vs $120.0
- Up to 10% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i3-10320 - $0.44 vs $0.49 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core™ i3-10320 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110320
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-950 3.06 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1366 Processor
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-950 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
