Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10300 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10300 is 963 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 9% better in FIFA 23 than Core i9-7920X - 173 vs 158 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $199.06 vs $556.54
- Up to 67% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i9-7920X - $1.15 vs $3.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 24 vs 8 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
173
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $199.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
Buy for $556.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |