Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10110U outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10110U is 783 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10110U
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than EPYC 7551P - 198 vs 194 FPS
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10110U - 64 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-10110U
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10110U | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Aug 21st, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | EPYC |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
