Buy on Amazon
$89.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105T outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105T is 1356 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EPYC 7551P - 129 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 64 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-10105T
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
129
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10105T 4-Core 3.00 GHz Processor (6 MB Intel Smart Cache, Turbo Boost up to 3.90 GHz) - OEM Version
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11701 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-10105T
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | EPYC |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
