Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 738 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 6% better in Starfield than EPYC 7551P - 53 vs 50 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
53
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Naples | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |