Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2572 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-4460T - 243 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $48.75 vs $84.98
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $84.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Buy for $48.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Single-Core
802
55.15818431911968%
Multi-Core
2190
48.971377459749554%
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i5-4460T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |