Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2803 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 59% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-4130 - 367 vs 231 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $22.92 vs $93.74
- Up to 62% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-10100 - $0.1 vs $0.26 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $93.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3398 minutes ago
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3397 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |