Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G6900 vs FX-4100

Celeron G6900 vs FX-4100: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

Intel Celeron G6900

3.4 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G6900 Logo
CUK Intel Celeron G6900 Alder Lake Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) 46W Intel UHD Graphics 710 (OEM Tray Version)

Buy for $39.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75180 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Celeron G6900

3.4 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G6900 Logo
CUK Intel Celeron G6900 Alder Lake Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) 46W Intel UHD Graphics 710 (OEM Tray Version)

Buy for $39.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75180 minutes ago

vs

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3737 days newer than FX-4100.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900

  • Performs up to 17% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-4100 - 135 vs 115 FPS
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of AMD FX-4100

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
Assassin's Creed Odyssey

Assassin's Creed Odyssey

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra High

Intel Celeron G6900 Logo
Celeron G6900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022


FPS

135

100%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

$39.99

100%

FPS Winner

CUK Intel Celeron G6900 Alder Lake Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) 46W Intel UHD Graphics 710 (OEM Tray Version)

Buy for $39.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75180 minutes ago

AMD FX-4100 Logo
FX-4100

Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011


FPS

115

85.18518518518519%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra High

Intel Celeron G6900 Logo
Celeron G6900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022

AMD FX-4100 Logo
FX-4100

Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G6900 Logo
Celeron G6900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022


Single-Core

1603

100%

Multi-Core

2696

100%

AMD FX-4100 Logo
FX-4100

Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011


Single-Core

409

25.514660012476607%

Multi-Core

1028

38.13056379821958%

Intel Celeron G6900 Logo

Intel Celeron G6900

vs
AMD FX-4100 Logo

AMD FX-4100

Jan 4th, 2022
Release DateOct 12th, 2011
CeleronCollectionFX
Alder LakeCodenameZambezi
Intel Socket 1700SocketAMD Socket AM3+
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
4
2Threads
4
3.4 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.6 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed3.7 GHz
Not AvailableTDP95 W
10 nm
Process Size32 nm
34.0x
Multiplier18.0x
UHD Graphics 710
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.