Buy on Amazon
$68.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $250
Availability
MSRP in USD: $250
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11260H outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11260H is 1134 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11260H
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G4900 - 195 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i5-11260H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11260H |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 54 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Celeron G4900 or Core i5-11260H
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, 1920 x 1080, Extreme
45 FPS
$22.18/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Core i5-11260H
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$998
In Stock
45 FPS
$28.87/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Core i5-11260H
32 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,299.35
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
