Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 539 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3500X - $53.55 vs $125.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Ryzen 5 3500X - $0.16 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 5% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G4900 - 314 vs 299 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
299
95.22292993630573%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$53.55
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
FPS
314
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
44.44444444444445%
Price, $
$125
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
39.61414790996785%
Multi-Core
1051
17.965811965811966%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |