Buy on Amazon
$53.55
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 50 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - $53.55 vs $135.0
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G4900 - 214 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75179 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Processor with Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics - YD2400C5FBBOX
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
58.27814569536424%
Multi-Core
1051
31.906496660595025%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
