Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 50 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 44% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - $68.02 vs $120.58
- Up to 42% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 5 2400G - $0.47 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than Celeron G4900 - 149 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
146
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
58%
Price, $
$120.58
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $120.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |