Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 488 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Celeron G1840 - 159 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 51 vs 53 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |