Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1820 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1820 is 1643 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Core i7-950 - 156 vs 154 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i7-950 - $46.41 vs $100.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-950 - $0.3 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 53 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
156
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-950 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |