Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 1095 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6300 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron B830 - 184 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$92.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $92.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |