Key Differences
In short — FX-8120 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8120 is 325 days older than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Performs up to 2% better in Sons Of The Forest than Celeron B830 - 90 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 8 vs 2 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
90
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |