Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3852 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 31% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron 847 - 284 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 24 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
284
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$432.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3052 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |