Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 4118 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 47% better in Lost Ark than Celeron 847 - 314 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 32 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
314
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$469.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |