Buy on Amazon
$499
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1723
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1723
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6950X outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6950X is 1808 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 17 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron 847 - 256 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 20 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-6950X
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
256
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
100%
Price, $
$499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80671I76950X Boxed Core i7-6950X Processor Extreme Edition (25M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz) 3.0 10
Buy for $499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2881 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i7-6950X
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i7-6950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
