Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 3306 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 17 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Celeron 847 - 125 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 16 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$392.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $392.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3077 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |