Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2940 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 9% better in Apex Legends than Celeron 847 - 270 vs 247 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 4 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
270
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $79.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |