Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 2300 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 9% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron 847 - 158 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 6 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $130.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13927 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |