Buy on Amazon
$143.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 3238 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 17 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 16% better in F1 22 than Celeron 847 - 280 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 12 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-10600K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-10600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for $143.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i5-10600K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Celeron 847 or Core i5-10600K
F1 22, 1920 x 1080, Ultra High
111 FPS
$8.1/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Core i5-10600K
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$899
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
