Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700T outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7700T is 2025 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700T - 17 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 12% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron 847 - 204 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |