Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 1304 days older than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 15 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron 3865U - 69 vs 64 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 4 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
69
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $55.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |