Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 1129 days older than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 15 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 2% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron 3865U - 196 vs 193 FPS
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
196
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |