Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 v2 outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Celeron 2955U have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Performs up to 4% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Celeron 2955U - 58 vs 56 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 16 vs 2 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Celeron 2955U
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
