Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2495 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Athlon 3000G - 17 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 12% better in Minecraft than Celeron 1037U - 656 vs 586 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 4 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron 1037U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
