Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5650U outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5650U is 770 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5650U
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron 1037U - 124 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Celeron 1037U - 15 vs 17 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Celeron 1037U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i7-5650U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | Intel Core i7-5650U |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 17 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 6000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
