Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2082 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron 1007U - 159 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 24 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$188.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |